John Barrymore Jr. brings a Sean Penn-like quality to the portrayal of his character Cooncat in "High Lonesome", although that probably has more to do with his similar looks than in acting ability. This was Barrymore's second appearance in a leading role following "The Sundowners" which came out the same year. In my review of that picture, I opined that it's doubtful daughter Drew ever saw him in that film; my suspicion is that it's probably true here as well.
When the picture was all over, I found myself scratching my head. What started out as something of an off-beat mystery Western, this wound up being a story that didn't make much sense. No reason was ever offered as to why the characters of the Smiling Man (Jack Elam) and Roper (Dave Kashner) ever hung around following the murder of Jim Shell in the abandoned trading post. Stealing Cooncat's money was one thing, but why all the other intrigue of lurking in the shadows; the disappearing duo gimmick got a little tired after a while. And what about all the men killed on both sides of the 'Jessup' fence when the Davis crew went out to tear it down? Are we just supposed to forget about all of that like it never happened?
And by the way, who killed Pat Farrell's (John Archer) parents? They were dead a whole week before their bodies were discovered, and the idea was that 'maybe' Cooncat was responsible. Well, he wasn't. So who was? Oh, never mind. See what I mean - story elements were brought in and then discarded as if no one was bothering to pay attention.
One thing I did like though - this was the only time I've ever seen Jack Elam's lazy eye referenced in a story. As he describes the men who instigated him to go after Jim Shell, Barrymoore's character states - "He had a cast in his eye so you couldn't tell which eye was pointin' where". I just wish they had taken a great line like that and gone somewhere meaningful with it.
One last thing in the 'it doesn't make sense' department. Remember the finale? - Smiling Man and Roper have rancher Davis pinned down with gunfire after shooting Cooncat. So what does Davis do? He manages to swing around and just walk into the bad guy cabin through the back door! What??!! How did he do that? I don't know, and you won't either.
When the picture was all over, I found myself scratching my head. What started out as something of an off-beat mystery Western, this wound up being a story that didn't make much sense. No reason was ever offered as to why the characters of the Smiling Man (Jack Elam) and Roper (Dave Kashner) ever hung around following the murder of Jim Shell in the abandoned trading post. Stealing Cooncat's money was one thing, but why all the other intrigue of lurking in the shadows; the disappearing duo gimmick got a little tired after a while. And what about all the men killed on both sides of the 'Jessup' fence when the Davis crew went out to tear it down? Are we just supposed to forget about all of that like it never happened?
And by the way, who killed Pat Farrell's (John Archer) parents? They were dead a whole week before their bodies were discovered, and the idea was that 'maybe' Cooncat was responsible. Well, he wasn't. So who was? Oh, never mind. See what I mean - story elements were brought in and then discarded as if no one was bothering to pay attention.
One thing I did like though - this was the only time I've ever seen Jack Elam's lazy eye referenced in a story. As he describes the men who instigated him to go after Jim Shell, Barrymoore's character states - "He had a cast in his eye so you couldn't tell which eye was pointin' where". I just wish they had taken a great line like that and gone somewhere meaningful with it.
One last thing in the 'it doesn't make sense' department. Remember the finale? - Smiling Man and Roper have rancher Davis pinned down with gunfire after shooting Cooncat. So what does Davis do? He manages to swing around and just walk into the bad guy cabin through the back door! What??!! How did he do that? I don't know, and you won't either.
