Review of Hulk

Hulk (2003)
3/10
Is this what 137 million dollars got you in 2003.
13 February 2020
This movie supposed to be like watching a comic book, but I feel the movie would have been better without the Element, but I've never seen a comic book have meaningless cinematic pictures. Why does the scientific imagery seem like it's from a cartoon. The jumpiness of the film imagery causes you to lose track of the story line very quickly. Plot elements are offbeat. Filming locations are strange.

3.9 stars
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed

 
\n \n \n\n\n