5/10
Penalized by inconsistencies
16 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Cinematography and editing are fine, actors are fine too .. BUT ... you have a policeman that find a stranger that tells a unbelievable story of torture and burial and killing and that is seriously wounded too ... and all he does is talk as if nothing happened?

No runs to the hospital, no runs to the Police station, no serious questioning about what did happen.

He looked more like a passerby than a policeman.

Then at the endig we have the policeman sister that tells the true story, but still we don't get the full story.

In his words we saw him strictly tied to a chair and tortured; was this reality or was this a lie? And if this was a lie, what did really happen and how did he escape from them?

Apart from this the movie wasn't a truly bad one...and the final twist of the silent passenger revealing as the serial killer is interesting ... but here too there are inconsistencies.

Eventually we see that the passenger's pouch is full of broken cigarettes. Should we believe that this "witness", so dangerous that he had to be handcuffed, had not even been searched?

Due to these inconsistencies I cannot give more than 5/10.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed

 
\n \n \n\n\n