I know that this show is a comedy and you are supposed to suspend all disbelief while watching but this episode was too stupid and ridiculous even for a comedy.
A woman kills a guy who killed her son and claims "she killed him in revenge" and she is found "not guilty" because Alan Shore convinces the jury that it's ok to kill someone for revenge even though he's personally against death penalty.
We get it, Alan Shore NEVER ever loses a case because god forbid the entire universe would cease to exist if Alan Shore ever lost a case but this one was utterly ridiculous, stupid and insult to intelligence of viewers.
A woman kills a guy who killed her son and claims "she killed him in revenge" and she is found "not guilty" because Alan Shore convinces the jury that it's ok to kill someone for revenge even though he's personally against death penalty.
We get it, Alan Shore NEVER ever loses a case because god forbid the entire universe would cease to exist if Alan Shore ever lost a case but this one was utterly ridiculous, stupid and insult to intelligence of viewers.
