Review of King Arthur

King Arthur (2004)
9/10
An interesting take
13 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This can't be a film based on history because we don't actually know what happened. I therefore think that it's good enough. I would prefer to film to be called Arthur because he wasn't actualy a King.

Even though it's not a Camelot type story they have used the names of Arthur's round table knights. Probably not a good idea but it helps the viewer.

I liked use of Hadrian's wall but I would expcect to see a Fort, not just the wall. I appreciated the refrence at the end to the battle fought on Baden Hill, but the battle we saw was not on a hill. I thought it was well acted and I was impressed with the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed

 
\n \n \n\n\n