Why professional (as in getting paid, not in having any skills) critics could like this film so much could only be because of the girl candy.
Clearly one needs no analytical ability regarding script writing to be a paid critic. The plot was scatty, like what was the bit about being grounded about? The girls often behaved in no consistent or cause and effect way and the moral, that revenge doesn't make you happy, was blurred by the daft ending scenes
There was no real chemistry amongst any of the characters.
I was expecting some entertainment, but ended up having my time stolen, always expecting it to get better.
I was expecting a plot that developed, not the mess that we were presented with. None of the characters made me want to root for them once it got going.
And as for the critics who called it funny, well that makes nonsense of the English language.
Clearly one needs no analytical ability regarding script writing to be a paid critic. The plot was scatty, like what was the bit about being grounded about? The girls often behaved in no consistent or cause and effect way and the moral, that revenge doesn't make you happy, was blurred by the daft ending scenes
There was no real chemistry amongst any of the characters.
I was expecting some entertainment, but ended up having my time stolen, always expecting it to get better.
I was expecting a plot that developed, not the mess that we were presented with. None of the characters made me want to root for them once it got going.
And as for the critics who called it funny, well that makes nonsense of the English language.
