My opinions about Oguzhan Ugur were quite clear in my opinion; I thought he was very unsuccessful in terms of series, movies, and programs. Despite being popular, he had never been involved in works that suited him. Until he started hosting political programs. He achieved a great feat in creating a democratic environment for discussion in our country. He worked hard and deserved recognition in my opinion. In addition, he achieved a great success by hosting a "special on earthquakes" episode. I have actually watched most of the episodes, and I wish everyone had watched them. This program is a historical record, and we already see many politicians changing their opinions. Someone had to take responsibility, and this team and channel filled that gap more than enough in such a challenging time for society. Regardless of whether we like it or not, it is truly commendable.
If I were to criticize, I could criticize the people asking questions. Generally, popular questions were preferred over high-quality questions, which, in my opinion, greatly reduced the quality of the program. More solid and result-oriented questions could have been asked. The number of guests was sometimes too high, and although it may seem like a good thing, in my opinion, it could have been more effective to have a few representatives from each group. I believe that in some episodes, politicians were not pushed hard enough. Therefore, even though it may not deserve a 9 out of 10, I support it because there are not many examples of this in my country.
Let me conclude with a wish. I congratulate the technical team for airing such a long program on YouTube in a short time. I hope that politics will continue to be discussed in a more respectful and pleasant environment without being a cause of conflict. Because politics is constructive and necessary in this century.
If I were to criticize, I could criticize the people asking questions. Generally, popular questions were preferred over high-quality questions, which, in my opinion, greatly reduced the quality of the program. More solid and result-oriented questions could have been asked. The number of guests was sometimes too high, and although it may seem like a good thing, in my opinion, it could have been more effective to have a few representatives from each group. I believe that in some episodes, politicians were not pushed hard enough. Therefore, even though it may not deserve a 9 out of 10, I support it because there are not many examples of this in my country.
Let me conclude with a wish. I congratulate the technical team for airing such a long program on YouTube in a short time. I hope that politics will continue to be discussed in a more respectful and pleasant environment without being a cause of conflict. Because politics is constructive and necessary in this century.
