I understand the antagonist is supposed to be in an unreachable position, but it would be nice if the person was properly presented.
He is supposed to be Sec Def but he is shown wearing a US Army General uniform.
Either he is Sec Def, a civilian position which means he wears a suit like any other civilian, or he is a military officer and not referred to as "Secretary".
Also, Army officer do not deal with Air Force matters, nor would Sec Def.
Either do research or don't try to misrepresent military.
Overall, a good attempt to show the issue as being the intrepid reporter seeking the truth.
He is supposed to be Sec Def but he is shown wearing a US Army General uniform.
Either he is Sec Def, a civilian position which means he wears a suit like any other civilian, or he is a military officer and not referred to as "Secretary".
Also, Army officer do not deal with Air Force matters, nor would Sec Def.
Either do research or don't try to misrepresent military.
Overall, a good attempt to show the issue as being the intrepid reporter seeking the truth.
