Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Detective Montalbano: Il metodo Catalanotti (2021)
Season 15, Episode 1
8/10
Hooray for Montalbano
20 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Why were so many reviewers (and viewers, presumably) so disappointed by the end of Salvo and Livia's long-running, long-distance, and increasingly boring relationship. It was past due to be put out of its misery. And, to correct one reviewer, the actress who played the character with whom Salvo suddenly (but not inexplicably) falls in love wasn't 44 when the episode was released. She (Greta Scarano) was 37, to Luca Zingaretti's 60. (The 44-year-old actress, Antonia Truppo, played the murderess.) It is quite understandable that a character mired in a boring relationship would jettison it for the promise of an exciting one.

As for the plot of the episode, which many reviewers also criticize, I found it no more arcane or implausible than the plots of many of the other episodes in the series. The murdered character, Carmelo Catalanotti, was as believable as the villain of any melodrama. The plot of the episode was no more convoluted or unbelievable than the plots of many other episodes.

This enjoyable series -- and its prequel, The Young Montalbono -- delivered many an enjoyable evening's viewing. The end -- or was it the beginning? -- seemed just right to me.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The English (2022)
1/10
Zzzzzzz...
5 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Whatta boring waste of talent. This is a throwback to the "psychological westerns", of which there was only one worth watching: High Noon. The borefest opens with an unexplained encounter between Ciarin Hinds and Emily Blunt at an abandoned hotel that is, as she says, in the middle of nowhere. No other buildings are in sight. How could there be a hotel without a general store, a livery stable, and a saloon? Why are they meeting? Why does he want to kill her? How does she know that he wants to kill her? And if she knows that, why did she show up there in the first place? All of that and more happens at a snail's pace, which I meant to be meaningful, I suppose, but it's not. It's just boring. As is the dialog, which reminds me of Last Year at Marienbad -- the most boring film of all time.
18 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guilt (2019–2023)
1/10
What's the point?
6 September 2022
I joined this series in Season 2. Despite knowing the back story, the exposition makes no sense whatsoever. Jump cut after jump cut. Who did what to whom and why? Who are these people and what do they have to do with each other? What's the point of this jumble? I'll never find out because I QUIT WATCHING. A subsidiary reason for quitting is the almost-impenetrable Scots accents. I'm a long-time watcher of British TV fare, but never before have I felt the need of subtitles. Having seen most of the actors in other roles, I suspect that most of their Scots accents are put-on, which could explain why I can't understand them. It reminds me of the great Robin Williams routine about a Scotsman explaining golf - the impenetrability of his accent was the point of the routine. It seems to be the point of Guilt.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hot air balloon
8 April 2022
The top review defends the casting at great length, but avoids the elephant in the room: casting blachpks in tradionally white roles is little more than political correctness/wokeness. And that's all there is to it. The rest is noise - to paraphrase Shakespeare.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enola Holmes (2020)
4/10
Just another sermon
24 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Women got the vote (in the U.S. and UK) about 100 years ago. Why is this an issue now? Couldn't the producers of this barely entertaining film have come up with a better hook on which to hang the plot? Stopping a serial killer or foiling a heist of the Bank of England, for example. The only redeeming value of this film is the presence of a semi-grownup Millie Bobby Brown who isn't bleeding from the nostrils. The actor who plays Mycroft Holmes is too small by far for the part. And the writers portray a Sherlock Holmes who lacks the perception and wit of the classic character. Enola's asides to the audience are meant to be cute -- and even funny, perhaps -- but they are neither. So, this is a film to see if your taste runs to irrelevant "message" movies.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Two Popes (2019)
3/10
Entertaining but ...
30 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a propaganda piece for Francis's left-wing ministry. It doesn't faithfully represent Benedict's efforts to combat sexual abuse by Catholic priests, Benedict's real reason for stepping down (poor health, and nothing more), or the relationship between Benedict and Francis, which is strained.
23 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing
3 November 2019
On the whole, this spawn Breaking Bad was entertaining but not in a league with its parent (unlike Better Call Saul, which is even better than Breaking Bad). Where to begin? Don't bother to watch the recap; it's just a few minutes of disjointed outtakes from the original series, not a lead-in to the situation with which the movie opens. Unless you have an excellent memory for such things -- or just finished watching Breaking Bad -- you won't know why Jesse finds himself where he does, and you'll never learn. Characters from Breaking Bad are recycled, but their past relationship to Jesse is never made clear. There are a lot of back-and-forth time jumps that interrupt the main flow of action. After a lot of sound and fury there's a limp ending, which has the feel of a setup for another sequel. I'll pass.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Killing Eve (2018–2022)
2/10
A let-down
1 November 2019
It begins promisingly, but quickly becomes predictable and gratuitously violent. Perhaps the gratuitous violence is what makes it so popular. I suspect that it is, given the tenor of the times.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The musical score almost ruins it
7 December 2017
I read the novel many years ago, as had my wife, but hadn't seen the movie. The acting was good, but for a few episodes of Hollywood-style over-emoting. The story line seems to be faithful to the novel, inasmuch as we can remember it. The settings are lavish, but consistent with the story line. The only real fault, and it's a major one, is the intrusive and overly loud and pseudo-dramatic musical score. Be prepared to turn down the volume from time to time. Given a choice between no background music and Franz Waxman's score, I would gladly have opted for no music.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ray Donovan (2013–2020)
1/10
What a Waste of Talent
16 August 2017
As subtle as a brick between the eyes. Every other word begins with "f". People scream at each other instead of conversing. The protagonist (no hero,he) deals with more problems in a day than a criminal psychiatrist would face in a year. "The Sopranos" is subtle by comparison, and often genuinely touching and funny. "Ray Donovan" is the kind of stuff that hack writers turn out when they're at the bottom of their game.
26 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of Cards: Chapter 65 (2017)
Season 5, Episode 13
1/10
Off the rails
31 May 2017
HoC's descent into the bizarre began in season 4. Sure, there were plenty of far-fetched developments in earlier seasons, but season 4 took the proverbial cake. Season 5 opened with more of the same. I'm about to bail on this once-engrossing tale of psychopathic political chicanery, just as I bailed on "24" a season or two before it was put out of its misery. Should I stick around until the end, just because I've already watched 4 seasons? Sunk costs are sunk. And there's a high opportunity cost attached to HoC, given the large number of good shows that are in my Netflix and Amazon Video queues.
20 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Quelle mess
22 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This film is set at Christmastime in a remote village in Quebec, the main adornment of which is the mountainous pile of dirt at an asbestos mine.

The story starts with Jos Poulin at the mine. Jos doesn't like the job, so he quits and goes to work at a logging camp. Jos doesn't like that job either, so he wanders home.

In the meantime there's Benoit, a 15 year old who lives with his Uncle Antoine and Aunt Cecile. Antoine and Cecile own the general store, and Antoine is also the local undertaker. Antoine and Cecile employ a clerk named Fernand, who is also the undertaker's assistant. They also employ a girl of about 15 named Carmen, who lives with them. Her father drops by on payday to collect Carmen's pay. Carmen seem to be an unhappy person. She and Benoit lust after each other, but nothing comes of it.

Benoit is an altar boy. He drinks from the bottle of communion wine, then he watches the priest do the same thing, so that's okay.

On Christmas Eve, Jos's oldest son, Marcel, dies. Jos doesn't know this because he's still slogging home from the logging camp. Antoine goes to fetch the body, but he takes Benoit instead of Fernand with him for no discernible reason other than to allow Cecile to play Cougar to Fernand. So she does. And they do.

Antoine and Benoit set out by horse-drawn sleigh to collect Marcel's body. Although it's the late 1940s (or the late 1960s, judging by the shortness of Carmen's dress), Antoine doesn't seem to have an automobile. But if he had one the main even of the film wouldn't have happened, and the film would be more pointless than it is.

The main event is this: After arriving at the Poulin house with the pine box for Marcel's body, Marcel's mother offers Antoine and Benoit a meal, of which Antoine partakes in a rather crude fashion -- grunting and belching all the while. Oh, he's also drinking from the 1.5 litre bottle of grappa (or something more lethal) that he brought along for the trip.

Antoine and Benoit get Marcel's body into the pine box and onto the back of the sleigh. And off they go, as Antoine continues to chug the bottle of grappa. When Antoine falls asleep (or into a semi-comatose state), Benoit decides to liven things up by stirring the horse into action. Now the thing that I expected to happen does happen. The pine box containing Marcel's body slides off the back of the sleigh.

Benoit brings the sleigh to a halt about 100 feet from the box. After pounding on Antoine to bring him to half-awakeness, they trudge to the box, which Antoine is unable to budge because his muscles have turned to mush after so many oral doses of grappa. He cries about his wasted life.

Antoine and Benoit return to the store -- which, cozily, is also where Antoine, Cecile, Benoit, Carmen, and Fernand live. Benoit, of course, opens the door to Cecile's boudoir to find Fernand there. Some muttering (but no violence) ensues before Fernand and Benoit set off to retrieve the box. Benoit, amazingly and despite the remarkable event that has just befallen him, can't remember which of two possible routes to follow back to the box.

Well, it doesn't matter. Because they eventually arrive back at the Poulin house, sans box, which has somehow transported itself into the Poulin's parlor. There, the wandering Jos and his family are kneeling around the open box, staring at the dead Marcel. And wondering, no doubt, why the hell they agreed to act in such a pointless film.

But maybe they knew that it would someday be voted the best Canadian film of all time. I'd hate to see the second-best one.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blue Jasmine (2013)
1/10
Another Allen bust
31 January 2014
Woody Allen used to make funny films. Blue Jasmine is billed as a comedy, but if there was anything funny in it, I didn't stick around long enough to find out. After 5 minutes of neurotic whining, I pulled the plug. Maybe Allen believes that kvetching is amusing. And maybe it is to a certain subset of viewers, but probably not to viewers with roots in the vast, non-neurotic hinterland that lies between San Francisco and Manhattan. I'm one of those viewers, and despite the "sophistication" that I acquired in many decades of big-city living, I still fail to find humor in kvetching. I have given Woody Allen one chance too many. Never again.
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring, boring, boring
5 July 2012
My hopes for this film were high. I wished for the Juliette Binoche of 1988-2000, who chose some excellent films in which to act, beginning with The Unbearable Lightness of Being, and ranging forward in time to The Widow of St. Pierre (underrated, I think). Alas, Certified Copy is of a piece with 2005's Caché, but worse. Caché led me by the nose until the very end, when it turned out to be about nothing. It was evident about 15 minutes into Certified Copy that it was nothing -- nothing but pretentious, meaningless chit-chat. I know when to cut my losses, so I did. My evening was not a total loss because my early termination of Certified Copy left me time in which to listen to the never-boring 1952 recording of Beethoven's 9th Symphony, conducted by Arturo Toscanini, with Jan Peerce as tenor soloist. It was (as always) an electrifying experience, quite the opposite of the stultifying experience imparted by Certified Copy.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terminally boring
18 January 2012
There are two ways to view a film. One is to accept and endorse the conventional wisdom about the film, and to endorse it because "they" must be right. The other is to judge the film on its merits. "Mysteries of Lisbon" has the following "merits": a simple-minded plot, glacier-like plot development, insipid dialog, wooden acting, murky cinematography, and half-baked attempts to inject surrealist touches (as if these could redeem the film's other failings). I went along with the gag for quite a while before ejecting disc 1 of "Mysteries of Lisbon" and finding something better to do -- which was easy, in the circumstances.
19 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Potiche (2010)
2/10
Don't waste your time
21 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
What a waste of a great cast. Well, "great" certainly describes Gerard Depardieu, who has "grown" as an actor -- from hulking menace to parade float. Depardieu's appearance is the funniest thing about this lame paean to women's lib. The film's fleeting moments of humor and barbed dialogue led me to watch the whole thing, in the vain hope that it would amount to something. (Thus my "2" rating; I reserve "1" for films that are so bad, so early, that I can't finish them.) As for Catherine Deneuve, the best that one can say about her performance is that she looks only as old as her character, a woman of about 50, even though she was 66 when the film was shot. Anyway, when it was time for a dramatic or funny climax, building on some aspect of the film's almost non-existent plot, Deneuve puts an end to the misery by singing (badly) a feminist anthem that celebrates the "soft" qualities that women bring to politics -- or some such tripe.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hollywood at its best
11 November 2006
I have now seen four film versions of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Last night I had the extreme pleasure of viewing for the first time the earliest and best of the four: the 117-minute, 1940 release starring Greer Garson as Elizabeth Bennet and Laurence Olivier as Mr. Darcy. The 1940 version shows Hollywood at its finest. Great actors delivering great lines with panache and wit in a lavish, tightly orchestrated, and fast-paced production that demands -- and deserves -- your full attention.

Garson and Olivier, in particular (but not exclusively), outshine their counterparts in the other productions that I have seen. Garson may have been "too old" (36 at the time the film was released) but who cares? She is now my image of Elizabeth Bennet: witty, cunning, cutting, forthright -- and beautiful as well. Olivier (33 at the time of release) simply exudes Darcy: stubborn, prideful, haughty -- and yet vulnerable and kind behind the facade.

The other three versions that I have seen all are commendable for various reasons. They are: 1995 (300-minute mini-series), starring Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth -- excellent performances delivered at a more thoughtful pace than that afforded by a feature film, and in realistic settings (as opposed to the gaudy faux-rusticism of the 1940 version) 1980 (265-minute mini-series), starring Elizabeth Garvie and David Rintoul -- somewhat stiff performances in a production clearly (and successfully) aimed at recreating the time and place of which Austen wrote 2005 (127-minute feature film), starring Keira Knightley and Matthew Macfadyen -- a mixed bag of performances (e.g., Knightley is good, if too juvenile; Macfadyen is a nothing) in a feature film that achieves more "realism" than the 1940 version.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Overrated, overlong Chinese noodle opera.
10 October 2001
Hero's wife and heroine's husband have an affair. Hero and heroine commiserate. Hero and heroine may (or may not) have had an affair themselves. This takes 2 hours? Only because the story is told s-o-o-o slowly, with many opportunities for the leads to look soulful. Best part of the movie: the soundtrack.
8 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed

 
\n \n \n\n\n