Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A not so successful attempt to renovate an almost decade old franchise, but kudos for trying
5 June 2021
In most of the comments on this page, where nuance seems to have taken a time off, this latest Conjuring entry is either the best horror pic ever made or a reason for banishing the producers from living in society. It is actually neither here nor there and the truth of the matter is, as always, much more complex than that. But if you're really just looking to be entertained for almost two hours, The Devil Made Me Do It will certainly do the trick.

First of all, I have to admit that I really enjoy this franchise as a whole and the main trilogy is undoubtedly amongst the best contemporary horror movies to ever grace our screens. While the spin offs are very reasonably controversial regarding quality, it is not a stretch to say that this universe is yet to deliver a bad film, which is remarkable given the very sad moment that the genre is going through. This is why I was looking forward to the Warren's return and I must admit not feeling disappointed while the credits were rolling - in fact, I was admired by what this movie tried to accomplish.

Being the first movie of the trilogy to not be directed by James Wan naturally brought about some changes to the formula. In fact, the script in itself (co-written by Wan) contributed to departing Devil from its previous installments, which is a nice attempt to stir things up (added to the fact that is really admirable when a franchise doesn't always play safe, like I dunno, most of the things Hollywood produces nowadays). Devil does not present the haunted house cliché once again and tries (not so successfully, it is true) to approach witchcraft, police procedurals and courtroom drama. That is, at least, what this movie's trailers try to sell you, which made me feel a little upset because I just love courtroom dramas and it would have been a nice addition to an almost decade old horror franchise if they just explored it more in this film, but that is just fine. Michael Chaves' direction is risk-free and even plain unoriginal at times. There are almost no jump scares and the scene which will most likely make you feel scared is at the very beginning of the movie. While watching, I guessed that he wasn't a veteren in the genre and yup, this is only his second feature film so give the guy a break. So we're left with a conservative direction and a somewhat daring script (albeit full of conveniences and no-ends), which is pretty much my attempt to summarize this movie.

Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are very comfortable in their respective roles and I agree with people here saying that they are the highlight of this film. No doubt Ed and Lorraine will make it into some people's relationship goals (including mine) and that is saying something about the charisma of these characters. I really miss the Nun, though. This new villain (played by Eugenie Bondurant) didn't really do it for me. The rest of the cast is funcional, with a special mention to John Noble for bringing to life a compelling and enigmatic character such as Kastner.

Alas, you probably won't be left down by The Devil Made Me Do It, but it definitely serves as a yellow flag for this franchise. That means: either be successful at attempting to renovate the formula next time around or risk falling into ostracism. For this movie's risk taking, I will give it a 7, which in my rating's book is: good.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Morning, Verônica (2020–2024)
4/10
Treat this protagonist as what she really is, an anti-hero.
31 May 2021
Well, I just finished watching this series on Netflix and I'll admit that I'm feeling a little disappointed. After so much build up and some really memorable moments, it didn't quite stick the landing and I'm not expecting so much from season two, despite the (at least in theory) cliffhanger in episode eight.

For brazillian standards, it is truly a good show. I was very impressed by the production values and the acting by most of the cast. Kudos to Tainá Müller for giving life to a complex woman that goes through a lot of ordeal in these eight episodes - her acting is nuanced and emotional without being overly melodramatic which makes it almost impossible for me not to identify myself with her sometimes, despite the fact that she makes some stupid and over the top decisions that makes you question if the writing ever thought of triggering some consequences to her actions like it would be the case in real life. The two other highlights are Eduardo Moscovis (Brandão, the villan) and Camila Morgado (Janete, the victim). There is not much to say here, because the both of them are so powerful in their acting that the sometimes sloppy writing is more than compensated for. I especially enjoyed watching Morgado's character struggle through the recognition and denial of the situation she is immersed in. She is not a dumb woman who happens to be a victim and everything from her actions to her eyes conveys that. If this was not the case, it would be very hard to sympathize with her. This is it, at least regarding the cast. Because Antonio Grassi, Elisa Volpatto and Silvio Guindane just didn't work for me. Their characters lack depth and look more like a bunch of walking and talking stereotypes.

I was really gripped while watching this show. I practically binged the entire series in one go so I can't say that it lacks entertainment value. In fact, between this and The Undoing, another crime drama that was very appreciated in 2020, I would stick with Verônica in a heartbeat. But the ending is just plain annoying, because the writers just seem like they're playing for the crowd, leaving any trace of nuance to die. First of all, what is the need for the whole state conspiracy thing? It's not like this hasn't been overdone to death since like forever on TV. Another thing, the conclusion seemed rushed to the point of making me just sort of go with it after a while without thinking too much. And last, why in the hell did the writers had to transform Verônica into a vigilante? Really, is that the sort of message they were trying to convey? That this is a good thing? There is nothing wrong with writing anti-heroes. Hell, my favorite TV show is The Sopranos, for god sakes. But to condone their actions and make them seem cool, that is another thing entirely. Specially in a country so plagued by police violence like Brazil. All the cops in this show (perhaps Verônica the most) engage in problematic behaviour, something that leaves a sour taste in the mouth.

But hey, there are those who will like it. And that is just okay, because it really comes down to how entertained you were while watching. To me, this show deserves a 4, which in my rating's book is: meh.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dawson's Creek: Detention (1998)
Season 1, Episode 7
8/10
One of this series earliest and most memorable highlights......
28 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Having just finished watching the entire series, I really believe this is one of the episodes that will come to mind whenever I think about Dawson's Creek. It works so well and it's just such a powerful piece of television.

The plot is very simple. On this episode, the gang gets stuck in detention for various reasons. The penitence serves as way for them to release all the anger and insecurity they've been keeping inside throughout this season. There is a lot of catharsis here, especially in the scenes involving Joey (Katie Holmes). Kudos to Abby (Monica Keena) as well for being the perfect instigator of all the truth and emotions that pours out of this episode.

What makes these 45 minutes works so well for me is because it's a great example of a bottle episode. Really, it does everything right. All of the characters are very relatable and there is a lot of development here. The best part is that we get to see an early glimpse of their dynamic together - which in my opinion was still yet to be explored in earlier episodes.

Also, there is a reference to Breakfast Club that really got me laughing. It's something that Kevin Williamson likes to do and it makes this show so self-aware.

The last scene has a very obvious (but still pungent) visual message. We see Dawson and Jen working through their relationship while Joey is crying at the middle of the frame in the background. It perfectly encapsulates the tension we feel between those three characters and the biggest obstacle in Dawson's current relationship: his best friend in the world.

Adolescence is a weird and complicated time of a person's life. This episode depicts it beautifully. I give it a 8, which in my ratings book for teen drama is: amazing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dawson's Creek: Instant Karma! (2002)
Season 6, Episode 4
4/10
This show has seen better days...
15 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is my very first review because I feel like I have to say something about this show. Don't get me wrong, I really like it and I think that the first four seasons are highly entertaining - which is remarkable for any show that debuted so long ago, especially a teen drama.

However, I do feel that by season four the writers had already achieved what they were aiming for. A message had already been conveyed, one that spoke about the harshness of being a teenager and the necessity of moving on from things that you held dear in your childhood in order to go on with your life. It was an edgy show that presented difficult choices and was not afraid of depicting its characters in moments of weakness which every damn teenager can relate to.

By now, six long seasons in, the situations faced by the characters seems too redundant. For instance, why does this show feels constant urge to depict a given character having a relationship with someone much older in a position of power? Really, at this point, the same situation was experienced by Pacey, Joey and Jack. Whatever it is that the writers are trying to say with this, we get it. There is no need to keep involving those poor teenagers in the same situation over and over again. It has become awfully difficult to watch this situation replay itself.

Another character that has been very hard to watch is Joey. This may prove to be an unpopular opinion, but I really don't think that this character has much more to be explored. At least not so much in order to make the whole show revolve basically around her. We get it, Katie Holmes showed a lot of potential in her early years as an actress (it is in fact a shame that her career didn't go much further) and the problem has nothing to do with her but with the script. To have her being involved with another bad boy type is just plain lazy writing. It has even become formulaic at this point and I can show it:

1) Joey meets a guy and then hates him at first glance because he treated her badly (it is usually a horrible situation that would have no excuse in real life especially with someone that you don't even know); 2) The guy has a very out of the blue "redemption arc" in which the audience is supposed to sympathize with him. Joey starts seeing him with different eyes, always learning not to judge to quickly; 3) Joey and the guy start a unexciting flirtation/relationship that would be completely dysfunctional in real life.

Hey, I know that TV shows and movies in general don't have to follow the logic of real life, but to watch those kind of relationships evolve in 2021 is really dull. That is the reason why I can't understand why Joey is overshadowing Dawson in these later seasons. Sure, he was a little annoying until season two but I don't think he deserved this. Plus, James Van der Beek does a really good job with the character despite having almost no voice (but that's actually better than hear him yelling all the time in season one and two). His interpretation reminds me a lot of Daniel Radcliffe's in the Harry Potter series - there's nothing really special about his acting skills (at least not in display here), but he has charisma and pretty much nails the role of a teenage boy. And his character arc is so good that I think that it should be explored better with more screen time. Dawson is really running after his dreams and this is very inspiring and a great example for young audiences despite this show's writing having him doing things that are so unbelievably out of character like boasting to his ex about having sex with Joey (really?!).

And yes, I also think that the whole Dawson/Joey "will they won't they" has already run its course. This is yet another example of how this show has not much to say at this point. It is a great example of creativity being shadowed by the network's need to have more and episodes. To end with season four would have done great justice to this show and perhaps made it age so much better.

The only character who is still undeniably good is of course Pacey. Not much to say here, Joshua Jackson is just outstanding. I'm even tempted to say that if they wanted more seasons after the fourth year, why not just make a spin off based on his character? That could be fun to watch.

Overall, I'm just slightly disappointed. I do intend to finish this show completely aware that I will never reclaim the time that I'll spent on it or my youth. It has been an overall entertaining experience. I give this episode a 4, which in my rating book is: meh.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed