Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Waking Life (2001)
9/10
The Ultimate Existentialist film!
17 September 2001
Jean-Luc Goddard's 1967 film ended with the title "Fin du Cinema". And ever since then Goddard has been hanging around places like the Cannes Film Festival telling everybody that cinema is a dead art-form.

What I wouldn't give to sit Goddard down in front of Richard Linklater's "Waking Life" and see if he truly believes that art in cinema is dead.

This brilliant new film was shot on digital video and then a team of animators took years painstaking animating every frame. The result is a film which is an assault of ideas on consciousness, our sub-conscious, life, death and our preceptions of the world we inhabit; punctuated with the most exuberantly exciting visuals that I have been seen in a film in a long time.

The film centers around a philosophy student, (played by "Dazed and Confused"'s Wiley Wiggins.), who wanders around Austin, Texas encountering a lot of intellectuals, poets, philosophers and eccentrics. As the main charcter wanders around, he notices there is something very bizarre about the world he is currently inhabiting. His surroundings pulsate like a heartbeat, several existentialist philosophers morph into the very ideas that they are trying to communicate. It soon becomes clear to our main character that he may in fact be dreaming. Unfortunately for him, he seems to be trapped in his dream-state; waking up from one dream only to immediately enter into another one. Amd then his plight appears to be even more drastic when it's suggested that he may in fact may be dead wandering around in some alternate state of consciousness.

This is an incredible film jammed-packed with ideas and visuals. The viewer is bombarded with ideas on how to live our lives and how to interpret our consciousness and sub-consciousness. The film requires multiple viewings to even begin to process all these ideas. I saw the film twice at the Toronto Film Festival and I know I have a long way to go before I can really grasp the depth of this film. Linklater's past films, ("Slacker", "Before Sunrise"), discussed philosophical concepts, but this is the first time the director has directly tackled philosophical ideas head-on; discussing Kirkegard and St. Thomas Aquanis. In the near-future, this movie will, most likely, be screened by just about every Philosophy professor in the english-speaking world.

I have been saying for years that Richard Linklater is the most brilliant and gifted artist to emerge out of American cinema in the past decade; and with "Waking Life", he may finally get the respect he deserves.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tape (2001)
7/10
Linklater's edgiest film to date.
9 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Linklater's new film, "Tape" is the most jarring film of his career. The film takes place entirely in a hotel room in Michigan where the main character, Vince, (played by Ethan Hawke),is downing two beers at once. He is waiting for the arrival of his old friend, John, (Robert Sean Leonard), an indie film-maker whose new film is playing at a local film-festival.

Vince's motivations for seeing John have less to do with seeing his friend again and more to do with confronting him about an incident which happened when they were younger. Apparently, back in their high school days, John raped a woman named Amy, (played by Uma Thurman). Amy was Vince's ex-girlfriend and someone whom both men are still infactuated with. However, the story is less about the somewhat ambiguous question over whether or not John raped Amy and more about these two characters and their lack of control over their lives. If any character in a Richard Linklater film can be described as a loser, it's Vince. He drinks beer, smokes pot and snorts coke throughout the entire movie. He is a drug-dealer who deludes himself that he also has a legitimate job, and therefore control over his life, as a volunteer fire-fighter. John, on the other hand, seemingly has more control over his life, but that's only because he deals with his shattered ego internally while Vince deals with it externally. John has a dream job - a young up and coming film director whose movie is playing at a film-festival. And yet, he is terribly dissatisfied with his life. He tells Vince that the film festival is only showing his film once in the afternoon and that it is only a small film-festival, anyway. One gets the feeling that the only reason why John hangs out with a guy like Vince is to feel secure in his own existence. He only seems relaxed wheh he tells Vince that he should get a life.

Two-thirds of the way through the movie, Amy herself makes an appearance in the hotel room. And it is then that we realize that all this time she has been merely a pawn in these mens' lives to allow them to feel they were in control of their own lives. Whether or not John raped Amy or merely had violent concentual sex with her, that situation was all about the self-conscious John feeling that he was controling someone else since he couldn't control his own life. And Vince's defence of Amy's honor has more to do with the fact that Amy never went all the way with him and John did. As it turns out Amy is the only one who has any control over her life. And, subsequently it is she who uses these two men as a kind of revenge at the way they have been using her. This is a very daring and extremely unconventional film which will have a hard time finding an audience. Certainly, it will not be for everyone. Visually, it is far different from any film Linklater has made in the past. In films like "Before Sunrise" and "SubUrbia", Linklater's camera was brilliantly unobtrusive, enabling us to quietly observe these charcters and what makes them tick, with Linklater never drawing attention to the camera. In "Tape", on the other hand, the viewer feels like a voyeur intruding on something that has nothing to do with them - the way Amy herself probably feels when watching these two men. And the camera is constantly drawing attention to itself to the point where it's actually distracting and even infuriating. If the sight of people talking in previous Linklater films felt inviting, this feels more like an uncomfortable situation you can't get out of.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed