Reviews

The first John Wick movie was excellent. I loved its simplicity, I loved the action, and it was executed brilliantly, but movie makers always do the same thing. They realise they have something cool on their hands and try to make it cooler.

What make the first film cool wasn't organisations that solely employ tattooed women, nightclubs filled with people who dont seem to react to gun battles going on around them or blind assassins, it was cool because of the simplicity of the story, how straightforward it was.

John Wick 4 was pretty silly to be honest. Another money making venture that completely missed the point.

A forgettable number from Guy Ritchie, but pretty much what you expect from Jason Statham playing a Jason Statham spy role.

It's not terrible, but there is nothing that particularly stands out. The plot is generic with few twists or turns, the actors do their jobs without produce anything worth writing home about.

Jason Statham does exactly what Jason Statham always does. He looks super convincing beating the hell out of people and he is his usual dry, witty self. He literally does this in almost every movie.

Aubrey Plaza's performance is strange. Like they said go out there and be Aubrey Plaza and that exactly what she did. Do actors act anymore or do they just read lines as themselves?

Hugh Grant is decent as a kind of bad guy, I assume Josh Hartnett needs money, and everyone else is pretty generic.

Decidedly forgettable.

Was really looking forward to this movie, but watching it made me sad and a little angry.

I can only assume the studio got involved. I can think of no other reason for how strange the story line is. I kept wondering if I'd fallen asleep and missed something. It's puzzling how a team of film makers can produce something so devoid of direction, and I can only assume the editor has never edited anything before.

$85m down the drain.

Typical M. Night Shyamalan film. Atrocious from start to finish. At the end you feel angry you put yourself through another one on the word of a colleague who said "oh I quite like that film". I can only assume the director has the gift of the gab & uses it to convince foolish studio execs he can make a good movie.

Say what you want about the prequels, so many flaws, but some great stuff too. The lightsaber fights were amazing. They also felt like the Star Wars universe, they were just silly in a lot of places, but this film, along with it's predecessor, are muddled.

There seems to be no connection between this film and the previous film. We all know why. The director of the previous episode was allowed to go his own way, which turned out to be a serious error. This film is all over the place. The end didn't really seem like an end. There were so many moments where i thought "what was the point of that?" Seemed like they had an idea, chucked it in, and went right on with the story.

They should have kept it simple. A simple story & great action. An end to a saga, but no, not that.

I had no emotional connection to this film. None. A very disappointing movie from start to finish and it's only redeeming point was that it's not quite as bad as the previous one.

A resounding "meh"