Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
I am a critical thinker
8 January 2024
First off the critics whose minds will never be changed. The medical examiner's report is the the scientific examination of the body of George Floyd. He found no evidence that George Floyd died of asphyxiation. He found no bruising and no injury to the body. He found that he had severe cardiac diseases with blocking if his arteries. The physical exertion during his arrest lead to cardiac arrest with contributing factors were the fentanyl and meth found in his system.

The critical factor is the training manuals that show the technique was approved by the department and the Chief of Police lying. The angle of the video of Chavin's knee as the whether or not it blocked his artery or breathing is not supported by the autopsy report. From the angle provided in the videos from body cams you see his knee is more on the back of the shoulder and neck.

The previous arrest of Floyd where he used the same tactics trying to avoid arrest and that he ingested drugs to conceal them tell me that his behavior is deliberate and a tactic.

That within 36 seconds of taking him to the ground an ambulance was requested tells me these officers were concerned he may be suffering a medical episode. The delay of the response time by medical personnel is inexcusable but not taken into consideration as contributing to his death. There is a paramedic witness who spent her time video recording the event instead of calling 911 instead of assisting officers.

Critics point supposed previous complaints against Chauvin but ignore George Floyds extensive violent history and used of drugs. None Floys history was allowed but Chauvin's unsubstantiated citizen complaints were.

This was a political lynching of these officers. Officer Kueng is Black and he actually arrested and cuffed Floyd but no mention in the media stories he is black. He administered CPR. He called for the ambulance.

No change of venue due to prejudicial media coverage and the questions of BLM of jurors.

No this is a travesty. This is an example of the weaponization of the criminal justice system.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
V3 (2013)
Good story line
27 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
While this movie is well directed, it lacks a little more "thriller" as depicted in the description. The actors generally did a very good job in their parts. knowing that technical and special effects are expensive for a low budget production, they would have greatly added to the the otherwise slow development of the plot. The setting in a college town, which this movie was produced in needed to be better exploited. This community would certainly have enthusiastically embraced the production and may have added to the realism that the director was striving to achieve. Hopefully future projects will increase in this area. I would like to say the actors while not professionals certainly should continue in their pursuit of this career.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed

 
\n \n \n\n\n