Change Your Image
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjQ4MTY5NzU2M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDc5NTgwMTI@._V1_SY100_SX100_.jpg)
Glilyerami
Reviews
The Sopranos (1999)
10 Yawns!!!
Already there are so many reviews applauding every aspect of the series. I would just like to include characters that broke the show.
#1 : Meadow Soprano: THE MOST PAINFUL! I've now watched The Sopranos several times and from the beginning to the very end when meadow is attempting to park, the character, the actor, her storyline a, and anything and anyone associated with her is just excruciatingly horrible. Why would they dedicate entire episodes on her?
#2 Dr. Melfi: with her it's two parts. I find myself skipping all of Tonys therapy sessions, which is sad because isn't that the whole point of the show. If they edited those out, would have been better. Then when she starts seeing a therapist and they start dedicating time on her and even him??? What were they thinking? YAWN...I could careless.
#3 Jakie Aprillo Jr: when Vito shot him, I thought thank God--but then we had to go through Meadow's "I lost my boyfriend b.s. His story just dragged on. Scene after scene of I promised your father or Jackie trying to prove himself. ONE episode maybe two would have sufficed.
#3 Adriana lacerva: I understand that aesthetically she was a welcome relief, but from "a hit is a hit" to her whole FBI thing, Adriana's stories were boring and vacant.
#4 Carmella's Issues: her priest, AJs teacher, her jealousy towards Angie, her trip to Paris with Rosie (don't get me started on that), her b.s.with Fiori. She came off as a hypocrite and her self-righteousness made her seem duplicitous and untrustworthy
#5 Ginny sack: I'm just confused by her character. What were they trying to do with this character. Bad acting is obvious, but???
#6 AJ's stupidity
#7 Paulies mother and her friends
#8 Artie's Pathetic whining
#9 GUMAS: Tracy, Gloria, the Russian, Valentina
#10 Paulie refuses
Heir to an Execution (2004)
Will Someone Please Take Her Camera!!!
I'm not sure how any of the other reviews were 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, etc. "A sophomoric attempt at film-making" Amen!!! This is truly one of the worse documentaries. Not only are the facts inaccurate, distorted, and omitted, but also the credibility of the witnesses ivy meerpool interviews leaves viewers who were unsure of the Rosenbergs certain of their guilt. In short, no credibility. Especially the over reaching grand daughters with scenes of hyperbolic emotion. Growing up with biased and hearsay. Even Meerpools methods as a pseudo journalist with follow- up questions was baffling. Meerpool makes the assumption that everyone knows the story, which with this case, she shouldn't have--filmmaking 101, Journalism 101. Attempting to persuade the audience emotionally and with "evidence" that her grandparents were wrongly convicted, as a rhetorician I would use this film as a failing attempt and untrustworthy.